Representación de los elementos de un Sistema Nacional de Innovación mediante el Modelo de Sistema Sustentable
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Este artículo profundiza el análisis realizado en trabajos anteriores relacionados con el establecimiento de un sistema nacional de inteligencia competitiva y tecnológica. En el artículo se sugiere una estructura sistémica y teórica que constituyen la fundación de dicho sistema nacional. Desarrollando una adaptación del conocido modelo de Sistema Viable el cual es un buen punto de partida para la estructuración de los sistemas de innovación e inteligencia competitiva y tecnológica en diferentes niveles de agregación.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
La Revista de Ciencia y Tecnología sostiene su compromiso con las políticas de Acceso Abierto a la información científica, al considerar que tanto las publicaciones científicas como las investigaciones financiadas con fondos públicos deben circular en Internet en forma libre y gratuita. Los trabajos publicados en la Revista de Ciencia y Tecnología están bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 2.5 Argentina.
Citas
Rodríguez-Salvador, M. Sistema Nacional de Inteligencia Competitiva y Tecnológica: Educación para un Desarrollo Innovador. Puzzle, 4(16), p.12-19, 2005.
Rodríguez-Salvador, M. and López-Martínez, R. Proposition d’intelligence territoriale: Systeme national d’intelligence competitive et technologique. Information, Savoirs, Décisions & Médiations (30), 2007.
Rodríguez, M. and Escorsa, P. Transformación de la información a la inteligencia tecnológica en la organización empresarial: instrumento clave para la toma de decisiones estratégicas. RECITEC, 2(3), p.177-202, 1998.
Rodríguez-Salvador, M., Eddy-Valdez, A. and Garza-Cavazos, R. Industry/university cooperative research in competitive technical intelligence: a case of indentifying technological trends for a Mexican steel manufacturer. Research Evaluation, 11(3), p.165-173, 2002.
Rodríguez, M. and López-Martínez, R. Cognitive structure of research: scientometric mapping in sintered materials. Research Evaluation, 9(3), p.189-200, 2000.
Calof, J. Selling competitive intelligence. Competitive Intelligence Magazine. 11(1), p. 39-42, 2008.
Dishman, P. and Calof, J. Competitive Intelligence: a multiphasic precedent to marketing strategy. European Journal of Marketing. 42(7/8), p. 766-785, 2008.
Calof, J. and Wright, S. Competitive intelligence: A practitioner, academic and inter-disciplinary perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 42(7/8), 717-730, 2008.
Rodríguez, M. La inteligencia tecnológica: Elaboración de mapas tecnológicos para la identificación de líneas recientes de investigación en materiales avanzados y sinterización. Doctoral Thesis. España: Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña, 1999.
Freeman, C. Technology policy and economic performance: lessons from Japan. London, Pinter, 1987.
Lundvall, B. National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London, New York, Pinter, 1992.
Nelson, R. National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. New York, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1993.
Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, p. 109-123, 2000.
Edquist, C. Systems of innovation approaches – Their emergence and characteristics. In Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions and organizations, p. 1-35. London, Washington, Pinter, 1997.
Edquist, C. Systems of innovation: Perspectives and challenges. In The Oxford handbook of innovation, p. 181-208. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1997.
Carlsson, B. Technological systems and economic performance. In The handbook of industrial innovation p. 13-24, Aldershot, Edward Elgar, 1994.
Breschi, S. and Malerba, F. Sectoral innovation systems: Technological regimes, Schumpeterian dynamics, and spatial boundaries. In Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions and organizations p. 130-156. London, Washington, Pinter, 1997.
Cooke, P., Gomez, M. and Etxebarria, G. Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, 26(4-5), 475-491, 1997.
Carlsson, B. Internationalization of innovation systems: A survey of the literature. Research Policy, 35, 56-67, 2006.
Andersen, E. Evolutionary economics: post-Schumpterian contributions. London, Pinter, 1994.
Kaufmann, A. and Tödtling, F. Science-industry interaction in the process of innovation: the importance of boundary-crossing between systems. Research Policy, 30, 791-804, 2001.
Padmore, T., Schuetze, H. and Gibson, H. Modeling systems of innovation: and enterprise-centered view. Research Policy, 26, 605-624, 1998.
Dalum, B., Johnson, B. and Lundvall, B. Public policy in the learning society. In National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning, p. 296-317. New York, Pinter, 1992.
OECD (1992). Technology and the economy: the key relationships. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
David, P., and Foray, D., “Accessing and expanding the science and technology knowledge base. A conceptual framework for comparing national profiles in systems of learning and innovation”, In: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 1994.
OECD (1994). The OECD jobs study. Facts, analysis, strategies. Paris: OECD.
OECD (1999). Managing National Innovation Systems. Paris: OECD.
OECD (2002). Dynamising national innovation systems. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Edquist, C., Hommen, L., Johnson, B., et al. “The ISE Policy Statement - The Innovation Policy Implications of the ‘Innovation Systems and European Integration’ (ISE) Research Project”, Linköping: European Commission, 1998.
Soete, L. and STRATA-ETAN Expert Group. Benchmarking national research policies: The impact of RTD on competitiveness and employment (IRCE). Brussels: European Commission, DG Research, 2002.
Ackoff, R., et al., “Towards a system of systems concepts”, In: Management Science Series A-Theory, p.661-671, 17(11), 1971.
Boulding, K., “General systems theory - The skeleton of science”, In: Management Science, 2(3), p.197-208, 1956.
Jordan, N., “Themes in speculative psychology”, London, Tavistock Publications, 1968.
von Bertalanffy, L. General system theory: foundations, development, applications. New York: Braziller, 1968.
Checkland, P., “Systems thinking, systems practice”, Chichester: Wiley, 1981.
Mingers, J. “Systems typologies in the light of autopoiesis: A reconceptualization of Boulding's hierarchy, and a typology of self-referential systems”, In: Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 14, p. 303-313, 1997.
Churchman, C., “The design of inquiring systems: basic concepts of systems and organization”, New York: Basic Books, 1971.
Beer, S. “Brain of the firm: the managerial cybernetics of organization”. London, Allen Lane, the Penguin Press, 1972.
Beer, S., “The heart of enterprise”, Chichester: Wiley, 1979.
Beer, S., et al., “Diagnosing the system for organizations”, Chichester: J. Wiley, 1985.
Ashby, W., et al., “Requisite variety and its implications for the control of complex systems”, In: Cybernetica, 1, p.83-99, 1958.
Ashby, W., et al., “An Introduction to cybernetics”, London: Chapman & Hall, 1956.
López-Martínez, R., “Systems Thinking in Economics, Science, and Innovation Policy. Manchester Business School”.
López-Martínez, R., “Sistemas de sustentabilidad productiva: una visión crítica sobre las nociones de sistemas de innovación”, In: VI Congreso Internacional de Sistemas de Innovación para la Competitividad 2011 Agentes de la Innovación: hacia una economía sostenible en I+D+i. ISBN: 978-607-8164-00-4, 2011.
Devine, S., "The Viable Systems Model Applied to a National System of Innovation to Inform Policy Development” In: Systemic Practice and Action Research. 18 (5), 491-517, 2005.
Salo, A. Incentives in Technology Foresight. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 21 (7/8), p. 694-711, 2001.